Places in the Bible Today:
Arpad
Data
| Translated Names | Arpad, Arphad |
|---|---|
| Type | settlement |
| Geo Data |
KML (for Google Earth) GeoJSON (for GIS applications) |
1 Identification
- Tell Rifat (modern): 80% confidence
Verses (6)
Linked Data Identifiers
| Source | Identifier |
|---|---|
| Biblemapper.com | 172 |
| Logos Factbook | Arpad |
| OpenBible.info (2007) | Arpad |
| OpenBible.info | a173c40 (Arpad) |
| TIPNR | Arpad@2Ki.18.34 |
| UBS Names Database | ot ID_376 |
| Wikidata | Q698634 |
Sources
- Anchor Yale Bible Dictionary (1992): Arpad (place)
- Baker Illustrated Bible Dictionary (2013): Arpad
- Baly, Atlas of the Biblical World (1971): Arpad
- Carta Bible Atlas, 5th Edition (2011)
- Eerdmans Dictionary of the Bible (2000): Arpad
- ESV Bible Atlas (2010)
- Grollenberg, Atlas of the Bible (1957): Arpad
- Hammond Atlas of the Bible Lands (2007): Arpad
- HarperCollins Bible Dictionary (2011): Arpad
- HarperCollins Concise Atlas of the Bible (1991)
- Holman Illustrated Bible Dictionary (2003)
- International Standard Bible Encyclopedia (1979): Arpad
- IVP Old Testament Bible Background Commentary (2000): Isa 10:9
- Nelson’s Illustrated Bible Dictionary (2014): Arpad
- New Bible Dictionary (1996): Arpad
- New Interpreter’s Bible Dictionary (2009)
- New Unger’s Bible Dictionary (1988)
- Oxford Bible Atlas, Fourth Edition (2007)
- Reader’s Digest Atlas of the Bible (1981): Arpad
- Tyndale Bible Dictionary (2001): Arpad
- Westminster Historical Atlas to the Bible (1956): Arpad
- Wycliffe Bible Encyclopedia (1975): Arpad
- Zondervan Atlas of the Bible (2010)
- Zondervan Encyclopedia of the Bible (2010)
- Zondervan Illustrated Bible Backgrounds Commentary (2009): 2Kgs 18:34; Jer 49:23
Confidence Trends over Time
This chart indicates how confidence in the identification is changing over time. Each dot (connected by a dotted line) reflects the confidence of an identification over the preceding ten years (e.g., the 2009 dot reflects scholarship from 2000 to 2009), and the corresponding solid line reflects a best-fit line for the identification. Confidences that cluster near or below 0% indicate low confidence. Because of the small dataset, it's best to use this chart for general trends; if one identification is trending much higher than the others, for example, then you can probably have higher confidence in the identification. This chart only reflects the sources I consulted (listed above), not an exhaustive review of the literature.
Thumbnail Image Credits
Contains modified Copernicus Sentinel data 2019
About
This page attempts to identify all the possible locations where this biblical place could be. The confidence levels add up to less than 100%, indicating that the modern location is uncertain.