Places in the Bible Today:
Gath 1
Data
Translated Names | Gath, Gittite, Gittites |
Type | settlement |
Geo Data |
KML (for Google Earth)
GeoJSON (for GIS applications)
|
6 Possible Identifications
- Tell es Safi (modern): 90% confidence
Tell es Safi
- Tel Nagila (modern): less than 10% confidence
Tel Nagila
- Tell esh Sharia (modern): less than 10% confidence
Tell esh Sharia
- Ras Abu Hamid (modern): less than 10% confidence
Ras Abu Hamid
- Tel Haror (modern): less than 10% confidence
Tel Haror
- Tel Erani (modern): less than 10% confidence
Tel Erani
Verses (38)
- Josh-Ruth (2)
- Josh 11:22, 13:3
- 1Sam-Esth (33)
- 1Sam 5:8, 5:9, 5:10, 6:17, 7:14, 17:4, 17:23, 17:52, 21:10, 21:12, 22:1, 27:2, 27:3, 27:4, 27:11
- 2Sam 1:20, 15:18, 15:19, 15:22, 18:2, 21:19, 21:20, 21:22
- 1Kgs 2:39, 2:40, 2:41
- 2Kgs 12:17
- 1Chr 18:1, 20:5, 20:6, 20:8
- 2Chr 11:8, 26:6
- Job-Mal (3)
- Ps 56:1
- Amos 6:2
- Mic 1:10
Linked Data Identifiers
Source | Identifier |
---|
Biblemapper.com | 439 |
Logos Factbook | Gath |
OpenBible.info (2007) | Gath |
OpenBible.info | a18873f (Gath 1) |
TIPNR | Gath@Jos.11.22 |
UBS Names Database | ot ID_774 |
Wikidata | Q1348441 |
Sources
- Aharoni, Land of the Bible (1979): page 434
- Anchor Yale Bible Dictionary (1992): Gath (place)
- Archaeological Encyclopedia of the Holy Land (1990): Gath; Gittites
- Baker Illustrated Bible Dictionary (2013): Gath
- Baly, Atlas of the Biblical World (1971): Gath
- Baly, The Geography of the Bible (1974): page 139
- Carta Bible Atlas, 5th Edition (2011)
- Dorsey, Roads and Highways of Ancient Israel (1991): I15
- Eerdmans Dictionary of the Bible (2000): Gath
- ESV Bible Atlas (2010)
- Expositor’s Bible Commentary (1984): Josh 13:3; 1Sam 5:6-12
- Grollenberg, Atlas of the Bible (1957): Gath
- Hammond Atlas of the Bible Lands (2007): Gath
- HarperCollins Concise Atlas of the Bible (1991)
- Hess, Joshua (1996): table 5
- Holman Illustrated Bible Dictionary (2003)
- Holman Illustrated Guide to Bible Geography (2020): page 80
- International Standard Bible Encyclopedia (1979): Gath
- IVP Atlas of Bible History (2006): Gath
- IVP Old Testament Bible Background Commentary (2000): Josh 11:22; Josh 13:2-5; 1Sam 5:8; Josh 13:2-5
- Lexham Bible Dictionary (2016): Gath
- McKinny, Historical Geography of the Administrative Division of Judah (2014): page 167
- New Bible Atlas (1985): Gath
- New Unger’s Bible Dictionary (1988)
- Oxford Bible Atlas, Fourth Edition (2007)
- Reader’s Digest Atlas of the Bible (1981): Gath
- Schlegel, Satellite Bible Atlas (2016): page 68
- Tübingen Bible Atlas (2001): Gat
- Westminster Historical Atlas to the Bible (1956): Gath
- Wycliffe Bible Encyclopedia (1975): Gath of the Philistines
- Zondervan Atlas of the Bible (2010)
- Zondervan Encyclopedia of the Bible (2010)
- Zondervan Illustrated Bible Backgrounds Commentary (2009): 1Kgs 2:8; Mic 1:10
- Zondervan Pictorial Bible Atlas (1972): page 85
Confidence Trends over Time
This chart indicates how confidence in the identifications is changing over time. Each dot (connected by a dotted line) reflects the confidence of an identification over the preceding ten years (e.g., the 2009 dot reflects scholarship from 2000 to 2009), and the corresponding solid line reflects a best-fit line for the identification. Confidences that cluster near or below 0% indicate low confidence. Because of the small dataset, it's best to use this chart for general trends; if one identification is trending much higher than the others (in this case, Tell es Safi), then you can probably have higher confidence in the identification. This chart only reflects the sources I consulted (listed above), not an exhaustive review of the literature.
Places with Similar Names
Thumbnail Image Credits
Ori~, Amos Meron, Danny Gershoni, Contains modified Copernicus Sentinel data 2019, Aaadir, יפעת אופק
About
This page attempts to identify all the possible locations where this biblical place could be. The confidence levels add up to less than 100%, indicating that the modern location is uncertain.
It's best to think about the confidences in relative rather than absolute terms. Often they reflect different schools of thought, each confident in their identifications.