Places in the Bible Today:

Misgab

Data

Translated NameMisgab
Typesettlement
Geo Data KML (for Google Earth)
GeoJSON (for GIS applications)

2 Possible Identifications

  1. not a proper name (fortress): 55% confidence
  2. in Moab 1 (ancient): 15% confidence
    1. panorama of a wadi in Moab 1in Moab 1

Verses (1)

Jer 48:1

Linked Data Identifiers

SourceIdentifier
OpenBible.infoa7719f8 (Misgab)
TIPNRMisgab@Jer.48.1

Sources

  1. Baker Illustrated Bible Dictionary (2013): Misgab
  2. Baly, Atlas of the Biblical World (1971): Misgab
  3. Expositor’s Bible Commentary (1984): Jer 48:1-2
  4. Holman Illustrated Bible Dictionary (2003): Misgab
  5. International Standard Bible Encyclopedia (1979): Misgab
  6. Nelson’s Illustrated Bible Dictionary (2014): Misgab
  7. New Unger’s Bible Dictionary (1988): Misgab
  8. Tyndale Bible Dictionary (2001): Misgab
  9. Westminster Historical Atlas to the Bible (1956): Misgab
  10. Wycliffe Bible Encyclopedia (1975): Misgab
  11. Zondervan Encyclopedia of the Bible (2010): Misgab

Confidence Trends over Time

This chart indicates how confidence in the identifications is changing over time. Each dot (connected by a dotted line) reflects the confidence of an identification over the preceding ten years (e.g., the 2009 dot reflects scholarship from 2000 to 2009), and the corresponding solid line reflects a best-fit line for the identification. Confidences that cluster near or below 0% indicate low confidence. Because of the small dataset, it's best to use this chart for general trends; if one identification is trending much higher than the others (in this case, not a proper name (fortress)), then you can probably have higher confidence in the identification. This chart only reflects the sources I consulted (listed above), not an exhaustive review of the literature.

Thumbnail Image Credits

Adeeb Atwan

About

This page attempts to identify all the possible locations where this biblical place could be. The confidence levels add up to less than 100%, indicating that the modern location is uncertain. It's best to think about the confidences in relative rather than absolute terms. Often they reflect different schools of thought, each confident in their identifications.

The isobands you see on the map (gray areas with dark borders) attempt to give you confidence where a region is. Because many ancient regions aren't precisely defined, I consulted atlases to determine where the biblical region is located and used that data to build the isobands. The smaller isobands reflect more confidence that the given isoband is in the region, while the larger isobands reflect less confidence. Isobands are a kind of contour line that here indicate confidence levels.